| RELATED
ARTICLES |
 |
| "Productivity,
the Stock Market and Monetary Policy in the
New Economy," Southwest Economy,
Jan./Feb. 2000 (Text
or PDF) |
 |
| "Productivity,
the Stock Market and Monetary Policy in the
New Economy," In Depth, Nov. 1999 (Text
or PDF) |
 |
| "The
Comparative Growth Performance of the U.S.
Economy in the Postwar Period," Economic
Review, Q1 1992 (Text) |
|
|
|
U.S. Economy
Productivity Growth
Evan
Koenig discusses one of the new economy's defining featuresfaster
productivity growth.
What It Is.
When people talk about productivity, what they usually have in mind
is labor productivityoutput per hour or output per worker.
Government statisticians distinguish among three underlying sources
of labor productivity growth.
The first is
increases in the amount of plant and equipment per worker. For example,
I recently had an ink-jet printer installed in my office. It saves
me from having to walk down the hall when I print something from
my computer. It saves others on the floor from having to wait for
my documents to print. So both my productivity and that of my colleagues
have increased.
The second source
of productivity growth is improvements in the quality of the workforce.
One would expect a workforce with more schooling and more job experience
to be more productive, on average.
The final source
of productivity growth is improvements in technology and in the
organization of the production processin other words, better
equipment and better management. The label economists apply to productivity
gains from this third source is "multifactor productivity growth."
Why
We Care. Productivity growth is important because it is the
main determinant of changes in our standard of living. Chart 1 shows
the growth rate of GDP per capita along with the growth rate of
labor productivity. Note how growth in GDP per capita tends to rise
and fall in conjunction with growth in labor productivity.
The most striking
feature of the chart is the big slowdown in both productivity and
per capita GDP growth during the 1970s. Average annual per capita
GDP growth fell from 2.5 percent in the 1950s and 1960s to 1.1 percent
in the late 1970s as productivity growth slowed from 2.4 percent
to 0.5 percent per year. We don't yet have a good understanding
of what caused this deterioration.
Although we
saw a partial reversal in the 1980s and early 1990s, it's only been
since 1995 that labor productivity and per capita GDP growth have
fully recovered. Driven by rapid productivity increases in the high-tech
industries, overall productivity growth is back to where it was
during its postWorld War II golden age.
The timing of
the increase in productivity growth is noteworthy. Ordinarily, productivity
growth surges as we emerge from a recession, only to taper off as
the economic expansion matures. In contrast, the recent increase
began after the economy had been growing for nearly five years.
So, there's reason to believe the increase is not just a flash in
the pan.
|
Evan Koenig is a senior economist and vice president at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas.
SUGGESTED
CITATION:
Koenig,
Evan (2000),
"Productivity Growth," Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas Expand Your Insight, March 1, http://www.dallasfed.org/eyi/usecon/0003growth.html
|
|
About
EYI | Global Economy
| U.S. Economy |
Regional Economy
| Free Enterprise
| Money & Banking
| Technology
Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas | FRB
Dallas Publications
|