|
Taking Stock in America
Resiliency, Redundancy and Recovery
in the U.S. Economy
A Letter from the President
The Economy in 2001
For a year that was eclipsed by
the September 11 tragedy, the economy ended 2001 on a positive
note. While the economy weakened in late 2000 and limped into
2001, overall growth was positive for almost nine months before
the terrorist attacks soured the third quarter and turned
it negative.
The good news is that the economic expansion
lasted a record 10 years. The National Bureau of Economic
Research put its peak at March 2001, which means the recession
began in April when total employment turned down. Growth resumed
in the fourth quarter—surprising most forecasters—which means
the recession had only one negative quarter.
Monetary Policy
The early recovery resulted largely
from the most aggressive easing of U.S. monetary policy in
history. The Fed pumped up money growth last year, cut the
target federal funds rate from 6.5 percent to 1.75 percent
and reduced the discount rate from 6 percent to 1.25 percent.
While the recovery has already begun, its strength and durability
remain uncertain. Inflation declined during the recession
and seems poised to decline further as growth accelerates
in an economy with considerable slack. Talk that monetary
policy had become ineffective—and was like pushing on a string—subsided
as fourth-quarter numbers came in. The lag in monetary policy
makes it more like sipping vodka than pushing on a string.
Paradigm Lost? Or Paradigm Regained?
We can't know yet whether
the economy, once recovered, will get its mojo back and resume
the enhanced growth rates of the late 1990s—the New Economy
period—or whether growth will retreat to the glacial pace
of the previous two decades. The hallmark of the New Economy
was an acceleration in productivity growth that made other
good things possible—faster output and employment
growth and lower unemployment rates with less inflation.
Even during the recession, productivity
continued to grow nicely, an encouraging sign for the future.
Productivity increased about 2 percent last year on average
and at a rate exceeding 5 percent in the fourth quarter. Aside
from its favorable implications for our standard of living
in the long run, productivity growth in the near term reduces
unit labor costs and should help restore the profitability
needed for a sustained recovery without stoking inflation.
If the new economic paradigm was lost—which
I doubt—I expect it to be regained. My new-paradigm frog,
the unofficial mascot of the New Economy, may be in hibernation,
but it hasn't croaked. Looking toward the future, let me just
say that I'm up to my hip boots in tadpoles.
The Fed in the Payments System
In addition to easing monetary
policy, the Federal Reserve helped sustain the nation's payments
system in the crucial days following September 11. With the
other Fed governors traveling, Vice Chairman Roger Ferguson
exercised leadership that would have made Walter Bagehot proud.
Bagehot's 1873 book, Lombard Street, recommended
lending freely at high interest rates when the central bank
needed to act as lender of last resort. We improved on that
by lending freely at low interest rates and by pushing rates
down further.
In addition to providing substantial
reserves through open market operations, the Fed opened the
discount window to keep large-dollar payments flowing despite
some firms' temporary inability to make payments because of
physical damage to the payments infrastructure.
Donning my Reserve Bank hat, however,
I am proudest of the Fed's decision to credit banks for deposited
checks based on normal schedules despite our inability to
deliver and collect those checks while the airports were closed.
The substantial increase in check float that resulted must
be recovered through check service fees and is a financial
burden to us. But it illustrates the benefits of central bank
participation in the payments system with a public service
goal more important than the bottom line.
The Dallas Fed in 2001
The Dallas Fed had another
good year. Services to banks, other financial institutions
and the Treasury grew, and the banks we supervise remain healthy
and viable. We believe our research, public information and
education activities continue to make valuable contributions
to economic education and financial literacy and will aid
in the public understanding and support of sound economic
policies. On the management side of things, I didn't gain
much ground in my lonely campaign for the use of larger fonts
within the bank—especially in e-mails to me.
The Essay
The swift recovery from
the economic repercussions of September 11 demonstrates once
again the vitality and resilience of the U.S. economy and
the American people. That resilience and some of the reasons
for it are the theme of this year's annual report essay, "Taking
Stock in America: Resiliency, Redundancy and Recovery in the
U.S. Economy."
A Personal Footnote
2001 was a good year for
me personally. I came out of the closet as an aspiring drugstore
cowboy poet. I made new friends, and since September 11, I've
changed my attitude toward New York City. It is now one of
my favorite places. I like our renewed sense of patriotism
and am delighted that wearing and displaying the American
flag is no longer politically incorrect.
I met two Texas cowboy-poet icons last
year, Red Steagall and Alan Damron, and my personal honky-tonk
hero, Billy Joe Shaver. Billy Joe had a heart attack but is
still packing them in. His buddy Waylon Jennings died recently
of complications from diabetes, a malady I share. I also have
a personal interest and stake in a couple of others. This
has focused my mind more on the biotech industry than it might
otherwise have been. Biotech is the great hope of the future
and will likely play the same role in this decade that information
and communications technology played in the last. So, let's
get going, biotech. Time's a'wasting!
I've decided that Alan Damron speaks
for many of us old boys in the large-font stage of life:
". . . for the bleached blondes and
the broncos, we try to stand tall."
Amen to that.
—Robert D. McTeer, Jr.
| 
|