| The Prodigal Son as Central Banker
H. Parker Willis Lecture in Economic Policy
Washington and Lee University
May 13, 2003
I'm honored to be invited to
give the second annual H. Parker Willis lecture. Especially
since the first lecture was given
by Al's and my colleague Roger Ferguson, vice chairman of
the Federal Reserve Board. I probably should explain for
the benefit of the students that "vice chairman" at
the Fed does not mean the chairman in charge of vice.
My invitation came from the chairman
of the economics department, Art Goldsmith. I was flattered,
but I can't help wondering
why he left the country shortly before my appearance. He
turned me over to the acting department chair, Carl Kaiser,
who then turned me over to associate professor Linda Hooks.
I was beginning to feel like a hot potato, but Linda didn't
drop me—maybe because she used to be an economist at
the Dallas Fed. The Lord truly works in mysterious ways.
I hope you aren’t expecting a talk similar to the
vice chairman's last year. I know Roger Ferguson. Roger Ferguson
is a friend of mine. And I'm no Roger Ferguson. The main
difference between Roger and me is that Roger is a Harvard
man. You know what they say: "You can always tell a
Harvard man, but you can't tell him much." Roger has
a bachelor's degree in economics from Harvard, a Ph.D. in
economics from Harvard and a law degree from Harvard. He
later worked for McKinsey, for heaven’s sake. Where
I come from, they call that piling on.
Where I came from is the University of Georgia, where I
wouldn't be accepted under today's standards, but back then
Georgia was a football school. I'm told that Harvard has
had several well-known, distinguished alumni over the years
in addition to Roger. I'm not sure about Georgia. The most
famous Georgia graduate I know of is the late Lewis Grizzard,
newspaper columnist and author of great books. His books
include Kathy Sue Loudermilk, I Love You; Don't Sit Under
the Grits Tree with Anyone Else but Me; Won't You Come Home
Billy Bob Bailey? and Elvis Is Dead and I Don't
Feel So Good Myself. I'm not sure why I feel compelled
to share these book titles with you, except that my taste
in literature may shed some light on what led me eventually
to the status of prodigal son.
I left Georgia in 1968 to move
to Virginia, the home of two distinguished Virginia gentlemen
of different times:
H. Parker Willis and J. Alfred Broaddus. H. Parker Willis
was one of the first academics to have significantly influenced
the creation and direction of a governmental institution—in
his case, the Federal Reserve System. He was a forerunner
of today's influential academic and think tank economists.
J. Alfred Broaddus, on the other hand, is one of the Fed's
most respected contemporary practitioners of the art of central
banking. If H. Parker and J. Alfred had been contemporaries,
they no doubt would have been good friends—sitting
around a faculty lounge somewhere in overstuffed leather
chairs, sipping Virginia Gentleman, smoking dark cigars,
blowing smoke rings and opining on essential first principles
of central banking.
H. Parker might have said, "The
important thing for the new central bank is to avoid the
overissue of currency,
which it will succeed in doing if it limits its discounts
to real bills: that is, short-term, self-liquidating commercial
or agricultural paper that comes into being as goods are
created and gets paid off as the goods are consumed. Thus,
money and goods will rise together and fall together."
J. Alfred might well have replied: "Yes,
yes indeed. Avoiding overissue is most important. But the
central bank
should not only not overissue; it should be seen to be not
overissuing, because the most important thing for a central
bank is its credibility. And transparency is essential to
credibility. Most important of all, the successful central
banker must watch inflation like a hawk."
As the economics faculty here certainly knows, for years
Al has had the reputation for being an inflation hawk. Lately,
he's becoming a hawk on deflation as well. He doesn't like
inflation. He doesn't like deflation. I don't think he even
likes flation. One thing's for certain: J. Alfred
Broaddus will go to central banker heaven. Only hawks need
apply. And he is a hawk in both directions. A symmetrical
hawk.
Unfortunately, I got branded
as a dove a few years ago. What happened was I dissented
against the tightening of monetary
policy in June and August 1999. Not long after that, the
press began using the dreaded "D" word to describe
me. I didn't think it was accurate then and still don’t.
I never thought of myself as a dove, just a kinder and gentler
hawk. But before I could correct the spin on that ball, Business
Week called me the “Lone Star Loner.” Before
long people started putting two and two together and came
up with “the Lonesome Dove.” While I didn't like "dove" much,
I kind of liked the Lonesome Dove. I figured if the Lonesome
Dove was good enough for Larry McMurtry, it was good enough
for me. I had me a persona, a Texas persona. A cowboy persona.
More recently, after learning that I grew up in Ranger, Georgia,
one writer put me on a horse and called me “the Lone
Ranger.” He forgot an important rule of the West: "Never
call him a cowboy 'til you've seen him ride."
I thought this was harmless fun, but soon I learned why
Willie Nelson advises mamas not to let their babies grow
up to be cowboys. People take potshots at cowboys. This particular
cowboy was ambushed on Wednesday, May 2, 2001, by Paul Kasriel,
a friend of mine, economic research director of Northern
Trust Corp., in his daily economic commentary. In writing.
I quote verbatim:
Is 'Cowboy' Bob McTeer Becoming an Embarrassment
to the Fed?
Dallas Fed President
Bob McTeer is fond of dressing up like a cowboy,
boots and all. Not only does he
look like a cowboy, but he is beginning to act like
one, too. That is, he's starting to shoot from the
hip, or perhaps more accurately, shoot from the lip.
Today, the BridgeNews service quoted Cowboy Bob as
saying that the Fed was doing a 'good job' keeping
U.S. inflation under control. Is that so. [sic] Looking
at the three charts below, which show variations
on the theme of consumer inflation, it looks to this
old cowpoke (yes, on casual Fridays, I've been known
to put on boots and bolo tie, too) as though that
steer, inflation, has slipped Cowboy Bob's rope,
as it were. Robert Black, the former president of
the Richmond Fed under whom Bob McTeer served before
he became a Cowboy, was an inflation hawk if there
ever was one. In his retirement, President Black
must be wondering where he went wrong in mentoring
McTeer. Another one of Black's protégés
was Al Broaddus, the current Richmond Fed president.
Well, President Black, don't feel too down. "One
out of two ain't bad."
End quote. (How do you spell ad hominem?)
Well, there you have it. Cowboy Bob is an embarrassment
to the Fed for thinking the Fed was doing a good job keeping
inflation under control.
If Cowboy Bob weren't such a
kind and gentle cowboy, he would call attention to the
press release following last
week's meeting of the FOMC, which reads in part: "The
probability of an unwelcome substantial fall in inflation,
though minor, exceeds that of a pickup in inflation from
its already low level."
Yes, you heard that right: "an
unwelcome substantial fall in inflation."
I don't expect you students to get too excited over that
statement, but the economics faculty will no doubt recognize
its historic meaning. Inflation has been beaten down so low,
the FOMC would consider a further substantial fall in it
to be unwelcome.
I guess all that progress against inflation came after May
2, 2001.
Those of us who favor price stability, like Al and like
me, are not being inconsistent in wanting to prevent deflation.
If you are for price stability, you want neither inflation
nor deflation. We are all together on that.
Yet, with the target fed funds
rate at 1¼ percent
and with the FOMC worrying more about deflation than inflation,
I must confess to finding some satisfaction in the fact that
the Lonesome Dove is not so lonesome anymore. Maybe the prodigal
son can come back home to Virginia some day. (To Billy-Bob
Black.)
While I agree that deflation
is undesirable—and certainly
less desirable than modest inflation—I also agree that
the probability of deflation in the United States remains "minor" at
this point. People worry that we might go the way of the
U.S. during the Depression years or the way of Japan in the
1990s. But the Fed is smarter than it was in the 1930s, and
economic theory is clearer now than it was then on what to
do. Many of us, including me, like to disparage Keynesian
economics as a "general theory" of employment interest
and money, but it is still a pretty good road map for fighting
deflation and recession. It's not too bad as a "specific
theory."
Just as we won't allow the money
supply to shrink in a steep recession, as happened in the
1930s, neither will we nickel
and dime our response to early signs of stagnation in a postbubble
environment, as occurred in Japan in the early 1990s. In
fact, with our target short-term interest rate at 1¼ percent
and our money supply growing nicely, we have already front-loaded
a very stimulative policy, while a Keynesian countercyclical
swing in fiscal policy is also already well along. It would
be much better, however, in my opinion, to have a supply-side
policy stimulus than to have demand-side Keynesian fiscal
stimulus. Ideally, pro-growth tax cuts and other incentives
could be increased while partially offsetting any negative
revenue implications with spending cuts elsewhere.
Perhaps more important, however,
in avoiding Japan's deflationary dilemma is that we don’t have the banking problems
that continue to stifle Japanese growth. We took our medicine
early. That's why there are no large banks headquartered
in Texas—possibly just as the first president of Texas,
Sam Houston, protégé of Andrew Jackson, would
have wanted it. Sam's and Andrew's views on money and banking
were fairly clear and simple: They were for money and against
banking. As for central banking policy, they were for sound
money and plenty of it.
(That was a joke. Let's not get the Dove thing going again.)
As I said earlier, I think the chances of slipping into
deflation are fairly minor. However, I do think economic
growth should be boosted substantially. As far as I'm concerned,
pro-growth policies are also antideflation policies. So while
I may think deflation is less likely than Al does, I may
be a bit more willing to give growth a boost. So the difference
is only in the rhetoric and not in the policy prescriptions.
I will continue to be a cowboy while he remains the quintessential
Virginia gentleman.
Actually, economic growth has
not been all that weak by historical standards—only by the higher standards of
the late 1990s, the New Economy period. Over the past six
quarters, real GDP growth has averaged over 2 ½ percent—but
only 1 ½ percent over the last two quarters. The problem
is that productivity growth has produced that output and
income growth without the need for more employment. This
recovery has not only been a jobless recovery; jobs have
actually declined substantially. Aggregate demand needs to
be large enough to produce employment growth as well as productivity
growth. And given the degree of slack in the economy, my
preferred growth number would be well north of 4 percent
until full employment is restored. I don't think growth that
high would cause higher inflation, but it might help keep
disinflation from morphing into deflation.
We not only need to grow fast enough to reemploy unemployed
workers; we need to employ new workers coming into the labor
force, like, for example, the graduating class of Washington
and Lee University. Jobs may be a bit harder to find this
May than they will be next May. If you are at the tipping
point in deciding to go on to graduate or professional school,
you might tip in favor of doing that. But if not, things
will be all right.
I'm scheduled to give a commencement
address next week to the economics graduates of the University
of Texas, over
300, I understand. So I've been thinking what advice to give
on finding a job and succeeding in a career. Rather than
tip my hand here, let me mention something I often say to
training classes at the Dallas Fed. It has to do with the
importance of the "likability" factor in your career.
But first let me give you some other "cowboy advice." If
you go into management, do like the cowboy does and look
back occasionally to see if the herd is still there. And
of course always drink upstream from the herd. And whether
you go into management or whatever, remember never, never
squat with your spurs on.
Now to the likability factor: No matter how skilled or educated
you are or how hard you work, you won't go very far up the
ladder if you aren't pleasant to be around. I tell our trainees
about the test for likability I had when I worked in Baltimore
and had to drive to Richmond once a month for board meetings.
It was about a three-hour drive, as I recall. Not very pleasant.
The question was, Would I prefer to make that drive by myself
and have a three-hour conversation with myself? Or would
I rather take someone along to keep me company?
There were several people who met my three-hour test handily.
People who were fun and interesting to be around. Not boring.
Not too talkative, but talkative enough. While several met
that test, it was a pretty hard test to meet, and some of
my colleagues didn't meet it. Those, I tried to avoid carpooling
with. Which of these groups of people do you think are having
more career success today? Think about it.
I didn't know how to get from Texas to Lexington, Virginia,
so I asked people here, the dean who left the country and
others. I was told I could fly via Richmond to Roanoke or
Charlottesville and rent a car. Or I could get off the plane
in Richmond and ride over with Al Broaddus. About a three-hour
drive, I was told. I caught a ride with Al.
I've teased J. Alfred Broaddus a lot tonight. And I didn't
warn him that I was going to do that. But I knew it would
be OK, because Al is not only a valued colleague at the Fed
but a true friend of more than 30 years. I would take a three-hour
ride with him almost any day. But probably not four. No sense
pushing it.
But even nicer from my viewpoint was not that I accepted
a ride from Al, but that Al offered. It appears that I'm
car-worthy too!
Like me, Washington and Lee is lucky to have Al Broaddus
as a friend. I'm glad he brought us together. We'll be driving
back to Richmond in the morning, the Virginia gentleman and
the prodigal son.
|
About the Author
McTeer is president
and chief executive officer of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas.
|
|
|