|
Issue 1, 2002
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
El Paso Branch
A Decade of Change: El Paso's Economic Transition
of the 1990s
Over the decade of the 1990s, El Paso
experienced an economic transition. It evolved from a manufacturing-based
economy toward a more service-oriented economy, following
a national trend that started much earlier. This transition
has been particularly painful for El Paso because its manufacturing
employment is concentrated in the apparel industry, which
has been in steep decline in the United States for many years.
Despite this trend, the El Paso economy
continues to be strong. The growth of the service sector has
more than offset the decline in manufacturing employment,
and El Paso has had a net gain of more than 42,000 jobs over
10 years. The average annual growth rate of employment has
been 2.1 percent, slightly higher than the U.S. job growth
rate over the same period. Consequently, unemployment declined
from 11.6 percent at the beginning of the decade to 9.4 percent
in 1999. The current unemployment rate is 8.2 percent.
Proximity to Juárez
Ciudad and Mexico has shaped the El Paso economy in
its manufacturing-to-services transition. Manufacturing sectors
related to maquiladora activity in the Mexican border city
of Ciudad Juárez are growing.
Furthermore, El Paso services and services-related employment
is benefiting from the economic interrelationships generated
by daily flows of trade and people between these cities. This
article examines El Paso's economic transition over the past
decade and considers how linkages to Ciudad
Juárez have transformed the two economies from
competing to complementary ones.
El Paso's Basic Industries
Location Quotient Analysis.
The El Paso region's most important
components are the principal industries that make up its economic
base. We can see changes in industry concentration by studying
location quotients over time.[1]
The location quotient technique compares
the local economy—El Paso—with a reference economy—the United
States—to identify areas of specialization generally resulting
from geographic location. Industries with a higher share of
employment than those in the national economy are considered
basic industries and drivers of the local economy. This approach
assumes that basic industries generate sufficient employment
to cover local needs and all extra industry employment results
from external demand. Output generated by nonlocal demand
is a form of regional export that helps pay for goods and
services from other parts of the country (imports). Examples
of El Paso exports are blue jeans, plastic injection molded
parts and brokerage services, while an import might be financial
services from New York.
The location quotient (LQ)
compares the share of jobs in El Paso for i = 1,
..., n industries to the share of jobs in the United
States for the same industries:
| LQi = |
share of El Paso Jobs in industry i |
| share of U.S. jobs in industry
i |
The LQ is calculated using
annual (1990–99) employment data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics on 67 industrial categories. The resulting location
quotients and rate of job growth in each industry are shown
in Table 1. The combined group of industries accounts for
total private employment. A basic industry has an LQ
greater than 1, meaning the industry has an above-average
concentration of employment in the region. Accordingly, the
industry is a net exporter of goods and services, producing
output destined to service nonlocal demand. The opposite occurs
if the industry exhibits an LQ less than 1.
| Table 1 |
| El Paso Principal Industries |
| Manufacturing
|
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| Leather
and leather products |
7.0
|
9.8
|
–2.1 |
| Apparel
|
7.0
|
8.4 |
–2.2
|
| Rubber
and miscellaneous plastics products |
1.1 |
1.9
|
10.1 |
| Electronic
and other electrical equipment and components, except
computer equipment |
1.6
|
1.9
|
1.4
|
| Primary metal
industries |
1.3 |
1.3 |
–1.2 |
| Miscellaneous
manufacturing industries |
1.6
|
1.0
|
–3.9 |
| Paper
and allied products |
1.1
|
.9 |
–2.3
|
| Transportation,
communications, electric, gas and sanitary services
|
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| Motor
freight transportation and warehousing |
1.5 |
2.1 |
8.0 |
| Transportation
services |
1.6 |
1.5 |
5.6 |
| Electric,
gas and sanitary services |
1.4 |
.9 |
–3.4
|
| Trade
|
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| General
merchandise stores |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
| Apparel
and accessory stores |
1.1 |
1.1 |
–.1 |
| Automotive
dealers and gasoline service stations |
1.1 |
1.1 |
.9 |
| Wholesale
trade in durable goods |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
| Eating and
drinking places |
1.1 |
1.1 |
2.7 |
| Home
furniture, furnishings and equipment stores |
1.3 |
.9 |
–.4 |
| Finance,
insurance and real estate |
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| Real
estate |
1.1 |
1.8 |
8.8 |
| Insurance
agents, brokers and service |
1.0 |
1.2 |
4.1 |
| Holding and
other investment offices |
1.0 |
1.2 |
6.1 |
| Depository
institutions |
1.3 |
1.0 |
–2.2 |
| Nondepository
credit institutions |
1.3 |
.8 |
2.4 |
| Services
|
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| Personal
services |
3.2 |
1.7 |
–3.7
|
| Automotive
repair, services and parking |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
| Miscellaneous
repair services |
2.2 |
1.6 |
–2.7
|
| Business services |
1.6 |
1.5 |
7.5 |
| Health services
|
1.2 |
1.3 |
3.3 |
| Private households |
1.5 |
1.3 |
3.9 |
| Legal services
|
1.4 |
1.2 |
–.1
|
| Amusement
and recreation services |
.8 |
1.1 |
10.3 |
| Social services |
.8 |
1.1 |
11.6 |
| Membership
organizations |
1.2 |
1.1 |
.7 |
| Hotels,
rooming houses, camps and other lodging places |
1.2 |
.9 |
–.7 |
| Construction
|
Location
quotient 1990 |
Location
quotient 1999 |
Average
annual employment growth (percent) |
| Building construction
general contractors and operative builders |
1.1 |
1.3 |
5.7 |
| Construction
special trade contractors |
1.2 |
1.1 |
5.0 |
|
| SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics
and author's calculations. |
As seen in Table 1, manufacturing industries
such as leather, apparel, rubber and plastics, electronic–electrical
equipment and primary metals have employment concentration
levels above the national average. In addition, service and
service-related industries like freight transportation, transportation
services, apparel and accessory stores, real estate, business
services and legal services are also among El Paso's basic
industries. Not surprisingly, all these industries have some
connection to economic activity in Ciudad
Juárez, either by servicing maquiladora industry
demand for manufacturing components and freight transportation
or by servicing Juárez and Chihuahua
state residents' demands for goods and services.
Change Over Time
The industry job growth numbers
in Table 1 clearly demonstrate the tradeoff between the decline
in manufacturing and the rise of service employment over the
past decade. El Paso still has a larger concentration of manufacturing
jobs (16 percent) compared with the nation (14 percent), but
manufacturing employment fell 4.2 percent over the 1990–99
period. On the other hand, the service sector grew 38 percent
over the past decade. In addition, by 1999, 74 percent of
El Paso's basic industries were either service or service-related.
These employment patterns reflect
the national trend. Chart 1 illustrates the crossover point
for both the U.S. and El Paso economies. Service sector employment
overtakes manufacturing jobs in the national economy in 1982.
In El Paso, the crossover comes seven years later, in 1989.
In the local economy, the job shares in the two sectors remain
the same for about five more years, with a definite divergence
after NAFTA's implementation in 1994.
The apparel sector has absorbed most
of the job losses in the manufacturing sector in the El Paso
economy. In El Paso, apparel employment fell from 38 percent
to 30 percent of total manufacturing employment between 1990
and 1999. Firms have taken advantage of technological advances
in transportation, communication and production, in conjunction
with increasing trade liberalization, to move production to
lower-cost countries. (See the box titled "The
Gains from Trade.") Competitive pressures are the driving
force behind the need for producers to minimize costs. Just
recently, VF Jeanswear, the largest garment manufacturer in
El Paso, laid off about 1,180 apparel workers. In addition,
Levi Strauss announced the closure of its lone remaining sewing
plant, which employed 780 workers. A decade ago, Levi Strauss
had six plants and employed about 6,000 workers.
Given the relatively high cost of low-skilled
labor in the United States, apparel manufacturers reduce costs
by relocating to Mexico, Central and South America, and Asia.
NAFTA likely accelerated this process by lowering tariffs
on goods produced by North American apparel and textile firms
outside the United States.[2]
Other Growth Sectors
While some sectors such as the
apparel industry are shrinking and total manufacturing employment
shares are falling, there are still some growing sectors within
El Paso manufacturing. Table 1 shows that the rubber and plastics
sector and the electronic–electrical equipment sector exhibited
job concentrations above the national average, with robust
employment growth rates of 101 percent and 14 percent, respectively,
for 1990–99.
It is not surprising that the El Paso
transportation sector also has a higher share of employment
than the nation, given its dependence on foreign trade and
proximity to Mexico. Between 1990 and 1999, U.S.–Mexico trade
grew 236 percent. About 20 percent of U.S.–Mexico overland
trade passes through El Paso. As a result of the growing trade,
the transportation, distribution, warehousing and federal
government sectors expanded rapidly on the U.S. side of the
border.[3] El Paso's transportation employment grew 82 percent
over 1990–99. Within the transportation industry, motor freight
and warehousing employment and transportation services employment
had job concentration levels above the national average. Respective
10-year growth rates were 80 percent and 56 percent.
El Paso Employment and Ciudad
Juárez
Growth trends in El Paso over the
past decade stem from the city's proximity to Ciudad
Juárez and the fact that Juárez
is such a large and fast-growing metropolitan area. Juárez
has 1.2 million people and an estimated regional gross domestic
product of more than $8 billion.[4] It has the largest maquiladora
employment concentration of any Mexican city, with more than
200,000 workers and an estimated value added of $3.4 billion.
This industry's growth has a big impact on the demand for
goods and services produced in El Paso. Research studies suggest
that a 10 percent increase in export production in a Mexican
border city leads to a 2.4 to 4.9 percent increase in related
manufacturing employment in the neighboring U.S. border city.[5]
Likewise, a 10 percent increase in border maquiladora production
leads to as much as a 2.8 percent, 2.4 percent and 1.6 percent
increase in transportation, wholesale-trade and services industries,
respectively.
In El Paso, the growing manufacturing
subsectors are all linked to maquiladora production in Ciudad
Juárez (Chart 2). A rising number of
rubber and plastics, electronic and electrical equipment,
and primary metals companies have opened operations in El
Paso to service the Mexican maquiladora industry. Components
supplied include computer housings, electrical wire harnesses,
special dies and tools, and electrical switches. Currently,
more than 30 plastic injection molding companies, about 12
metal stamping companies, and nine electric- and electronics-related
companies operate in El Paso, employing approximately 4,120,
1,870 and 6,578 workers, respectively. Even though fewer workers
per company may be employed, they are highly skilled. In 1999,
hourly wages in these manufacturing subsectors were, on average,
39 percent higher than those of the apparel sector.
Manufacturing activity south of the
border is also positively influencing employment in transportation,
business and legal services (Chart 3). Given the
rapidly increasing trade flows between the two countries,
transportation and warehousing sector employment accelerated
quickly after 1993. Business service employment, which includes
personnel supply services and computer programming and data
processing services, grew 75 percent from 1990 to 1999. El
Paso's maquiladora-related manufacturing operations often
rely on temporary staffing agencies to hire additional personnel
to meet increasing demand. Computer programming and data processing
services workers help minimize the burden of the paperwork
required by customs agencies to export or import components
and finished products. Even though legal services fell slightly
over the decade, employment concentration was still 20 percent
higher than the national level. Legal services advise companies
on both sides of the border regarding Mexico's often changing
tax and labor laws.[6]
Not only do manufacturing operations
in Ciudad Juárez contribute
to employment growth in El Paso; so do the needs, tastes and
preferences of Juárez residents.
These consumers come to El Paso to shop for everything from
automobiles and designer clothes to soft drinks. (Juárez
residents have been known to say cokes from El Paso taste
better.) They are also increasingly relying on financial and
health services that El Paso businesses provide. A large share
of El Paso's retail sector depends on Juárez
residents for sales.[7] In a normal day, more than 150,000
people cross from Juárez to
El Paso and vice versa. Last year, there were 46 million northbound
crossings via the three international bridges the two cities
share.[8]
As a result of the expanding Mexican
customer base, El Paso retail sector employment (general merchandise
stores and apparel and accessory stores) trended upward in
the early 1990s and again in the late 1990s. Chart 4 illustrates
the growth over time as well as the severe impact of the late
1994 peso devaluation and the ensuing Mexican recession. When
the peso was devalued by 60 percent in 1994–95, Mexican purchasing
power in the United States fell by just as much. The recession
also caused real wages in Ciudad Juárez
to fall 13 percent, and consequently, El Paso's retail employment
also declined. Surprisingly, some retailers—automotive dealers
and home furniture and equipment stores—did well after the
devaluation. This is partly because Juárez residents
prefer to buy expensive items in El Paso during inflationary
periods to avoid high financing costs in Mexico.
Better financial services in El Paso
also attract Juárez customers.
A Juárez resident can buy a
house in El Paso using Mexican bank statements or Mexican
payroll receipts as proof of income. In addition, Juárez
residents can finance home purchases in their own city through
an El Paso bank that offers 15-year mortgages. Another draw
for Mexican residents is the high-quality health services
available in El Paso. Sierra Providence Health Network offers
the PASE premier program (derived from the Spanish word for
"come in") dedicated to the specific needs of international
clients, mainly Mexican nationals. As a consequence of all
these interconnections, real estate employment and health
service jobs have shown steady growth from 1990 to 1999 (Chart
5).
Conclusion
El Paso's economic base underwent
drastic change during the 1990s. The regional economy moved
away from its traditional base of low-skill manufacturing
toward higher-skill manufacturing and a larger service sector.
Proximity to the much larger sister city of Ciudad
Juárez, Mexico, has helped drive these economic
changes and define El Paso's growth sectors. Future economic
expansion rests on identifying the industries with the most
potential growth and helping the local workforce make the
transition. Investments in education and job training, along
with measures to expedite cross-border flows of people and
trade, are central to securing a bright future for the region's
economy.
—Jesus Cañas
The
Gains from Trade
Why do nations trade? Differences
across countries with respect to price differentials,
resource endowments and product variety create
opportunities for mutually beneficial exchange.[1]
When trading partners specialize in products in
which they have a comparative advantage, trade
allows for rises in output without additional
input. A comparative advantage implies that one
country can produce a good or service at a lower
opportunity cost than another country. By specializing,
countries achieve efficiency because they produce
and export goods and services with low opportunity
costs and import goods and services with high
opportunity costs. Thus, trade increases productivity,
which in turn increases income.
To illustrate this, the
Office of the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) released a study showing that the two major
trade agreements of the 1990s—NAFTA and the Uruguay
Round—have been responsible for annual gains of
between $1,260 and $2,040 for the average American
family of four.[2] Such savings, according to
the USTR, can buy three months of groceries, purchase
a year's supply of gasoline or pay the tuition
for two semesters in a community college. More
important, the USTR points out that "the
biggest beneficiaries from these price reductions
and income gains are lower income-Americans, who
bear a disproportionate burden when prices for
food, clothing and appliances are kept artificially
higher because of trade barriers."
However, free trade has
an initial cost, the so-called churn.[3] This
process, also known as creative destruction, occurs
when economies move from one economic activity
that has a high opportunity cost to another that
has a low opportunity cost. At the same time that
some workers are displaced by trade, the churn
leads to opportunities in new and growing industries.
The tradeoff is that often individuals must adjust
by acquiring more education and/or job training
to exploit the new opportunities and become competitive
workers in the emerging industries.
Notes
- See William S. Brown, Principles of Economics,
1st ed., 1995 (New York: West Publishing Co.).
- See press release, "USTR Documents Benefits
of Trade for America Families," Sept. 19,
2001, the Office of the United States Trade
Representative, available at
www.ustr.gov/releases/2001/09/01-73.htm [off-site].
- See W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm, "The
Churn: The Paradox of Progress," 1992 Annual
Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
|
|
 |
| About the Author
Jesus Cañas is an
economic research assistant in the Research Department
at the El Paso Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas.
Notes
The author thanks Pia
Orrenius, Keith Phillips and Mine Yücel for
their advice and contribution to this article.
- See Robert W. Gilmer and Thomas Wang, "Diversification
of Houston's Economic Base," Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas Houston Business, September 2000.
- Employment in recreation and social services
also posted strong growth over the past decade.
El Paso received several grants from federal
and state governments, totaling more than $45
million, to retrain workers displaced after
NAFTA took effect. Social services, including
job training and related services employment,
grew as a consequence. For more information
regarding job retraining programs in El Paso,
see Lucinda Vargas, "Maquiladoras: Impact on
Texas Border Cities," The Border Economy, Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, June 2001. The high
growth in recreation services may be a result
of the 1993 opening of Speaking Rock Casino,
which closed earlier this year.
- According to Mexico's Ministry of the Economy,
97 percent of Mexican apparel and textile exports
enter the United States receiving preferential
treatment due to NAFTA. The average apparel
and textile tariff to non-NAFTA members is 13.5
percent compared with 0.13 percent for NAFTA
members. Furthermore, the Office of the United
States Trade Representative reports that Mexico's
average tariff on U.S. goods is below 2 percent
and that about 80 percent of U.S. manufactured
goods enters Mexico duty-free. Prior to NAFTA,
the average tariff was 10 percent.
- For more information, see Pia M. Orrenius,
Keith Phillips and Benjamin Blackburn, "Beating
Border Barriers in U.S.-Mexico Trade," Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas Southwest Economy, Issue
5, September/October, 2001.
- Author's estimation using data from Group
Financiero BANAMEX, Division of Economic and
Social Research and Instituto
Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.
- See Gordon H. Hanson, "U.S.-Mexico Integration
and Regional Economies: Evidence from Border-City
Pairs," Journal of Urban Economics 50 (September),
2001, pp. 259-87.
- Employment in recreation and social services
also posted strong growth over the past decade.
El Paso received several grants from federal
and state governments, totaling more than $45
million, to retrain workers displaced after
NAFTA took effect. Social services, including
job training and related services employment,
grew as a consequence. For more information
regarding job retraining programs in El Paso,
see Lucinda Vargas, "Maquiladoras: Impact on
Texas Border Cities," The Border Economy, Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, June 2001. The high
growth in recreation services may be a result
of the 1993 opening of Speaking Rock Casino,
which closed earlier this year.
- Some El Paso estimates regarding Juárez
residents' contribution to El Paso's total retail
sales range from 20 to 30 percent. Work done
by Keith Phillips, senior economist at the San
Antonio Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Dallas, suggests that about 13 percent of El
Paso's retail sales are attributed to Juárez
residents. For more information regarding border
retail sales, see Keith Phillips and Carlos
Manzanares, "Transportation Infrastructure and
the Border Economy," The Border Economy, Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas, June 2001.
- In 2001, total border crossings reached 45.8
million people, down from more than 55 million
in 2000 and 53 million in 1999. This reduction
can be attributed to the long waiting times
experienced during the last quarter of 2001
due to increased security at the international
bridges after Sept. 11. To illustrate this,
during the fourth quarter of 2001 about 2.75
million people crossed northbound per month
compared with 4.55 million and 4.49 million
during 2000 and 1999, respectively.
About Business Frontier
Business Frontier
is published by the El Paso Branch of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas. The views expressed are
those of the author and do not necessarily reflect
the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
or the Federal Reserve System.
Subscriptions are available
free of charge. Please direct requests for subscriptions,
back issues and address changes to the Public
Affairs Department, El Paso Branch, Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas, 301 E. Main St., El Paso, TX 79901-1326;
call 915-521-5235 or 915-521-5233; fax 915-521-5228; or subscribe
via the Internet at www.dallasfed.org.
Articles may be reprinted
on the condition that the source is credited and
a copy of the publication containing the reprinted
material is provided to the Research Department,
El Paso Branch, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Publications Director: Kay
Champagne
Copy Editor: Jennifer Afflerbach
Design: Gene Autry
Layout & Production: Laura J. Bell |
 |
|
|